首页> 外文OA文献 >Performance measurement in the public sector: in theory and practice
【2h】

Performance measurement in the public sector: in theory and practice

机译:公共部门的绩效评估:理论与实践

摘要

This thesis examines attempts to improve the efficiency of local authority bureaucracies during the 1980's. A number of significant policy initiatives such as the establishment of the Audit Commission, the pressure for local authorities to implement systems of performance measurement and the introduction of performance related pay schemes reflect this quest for improved value for money. The thesis reviews existing economic theories of bureaucracy which show how inefficiency arises in the public sector. Two major hypotheses within this literature are identified; bureaus are inefficient because it is in the interests of bureaucrats either to produce too much output (allocative inefficiency) and/or to produce output at above minimum cost (X-inefficiency). The policy prescriptions arising from this theoretical framework suggest that strategies to reduce inefficiency must aim to change bureaucratic behaviour. One strategy seeks to induce bureaucrats to produce efficiently, whilst the other seeks to provide sponsors with the necessary information on costs to enable them to force bureaucrats to produce efficiently. Performance related pay schemes, which aim to change bureaucratic behaviour, are concerned with eliminating labour X-inefficiency. Our research suggests that the diversity of current schemes reflects a lack of consensus over the definition of indicators of employee performance. The general result of the introduction of performance related pay has been increased salaries for senior officers. Our assessment of the work of the Audit Commission in the area of value for money audits and our empirical research on the impact of performance measurement in local authorities indicates that a wealth of information has been generated in the form of performance indicators (PIs). However, the use of this information as a control device is limited as these indicators are clearly biased towards measuring X-inefficiency as distinct from allocative efficiency.
机译:本文探讨了在1980年代提高地方政府官僚机构效率的尝试。一系列重要的政策举措,例如成立审计委员会,地方当局实施绩效评估系统的压力以及采用与绩效相关的薪酬计划,都反映了这种对物有所值的追求。本文回顾了现有的官僚经济理论,这些理论表明了公共部门效率低下的情况。在该文献中确定了两个主要假设:局效率低下,因为产生过多的产出(分配效率低下)和/或以高于最小成本的产出(X效率低下)符合官僚的利益。这个理论框架产生的政策规定表明,减少低效率的策略必须旨在改变官僚行为。一种策略试图诱使官僚有效地生产,而另一种策略则试图向发起人提供有关成本的必要信息,以使他们能够迫使官僚有效地进行生产。与绩效挂钩的薪酬计划旨在改变官僚行为,与消除劳动力X效率低下有关。我们的研究表明,当前计划的多样性反映了对员工绩效指标定义缺乏共识。引入与绩效挂钩的薪酬的总体结果是增加了高级官员的薪水。我们对审计委员会在物有所值审计领域的工作进行的评估以及对绩效评估对地方当局的影响的实证研究表明,已经以绩效指标(PI)的形式生成了大量信息。但是,将这些信息用作控制设备受到限制,因为这些指标明显偏向于测量X效率低下(与分配效率不同)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Palmer, Anna J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1991
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号